Issue |
Vis Cancer Med
Volume 6, 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 1 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/vcm/2025003 | |
Published online | 22 January 2025 |
Perspective Article
Anti-cancer immunotherapy-related cardiotoxicity: preventable and treatable
1
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
2
University of Chicago, 5801 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
* Corresponding author: yxing@coh.org
Received:
26
September
2024
Accepted:
5
January
2025
Anti-cancer immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have significantly advanced oncology treatments but are associated with rare, potentially severe cardiotoxicities. Despite their success, these therapies are associated with immune-related adverse events including rare but severe immunotherapy-related cardiotoxicities. This review examines various immunotherapy types, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive T-cell therapies, and cancer vaccines, highlighting their cardiovascular risks. Cardiotoxicities can lead to life-threatening complications, especially in high-risk patients. Early detection and prevention are crucial, with comprehensive cardiovascular assessments and routine biomarker monitoring playing a central role. With immunotherapies becoming more prevalent, this review calls for stronger evidence-based guidelines to manage and prevent these cardiovascular complications, ensuring that patients can benefit from life-saving immunotherapies without jeopardizing cardiovascular health.
Key words: Immunotherapy / Cardiotoxicity / Immune checkpoint inhibitors / Cancer immunotherapy / Melanoma
Publisher note: The presentation of tables 1 and 2 has been improved on 14 February 2025.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Introduction
Anti-cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized oncology by leveraging the immune system to target cancer cells, offering hope for controlling advanced diseases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and other immunotherapeutic agents are increasingly common, but can cause immune-related adverse effects, including toxicities in the gastrointestinal, endocrine, hepatic, and dermatologic systems [1]. Among the most concerning, is immunotherapy-related cardiotoxicity, a rare but potentially life-threatening complication, encompassing myocarditis, pericardial disease, arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, and others [1–3]. Current treatments for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are outlined in the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines. Steroids remain the primary treatment for cardiotoxicity or irAEs of any other organ system [1–4]. Fortunately, immunotherapy-related cardiotoxicity can be preventable and treatable with early detection and prevention. This article reviews types of immune therapies, signs of cardiovascular toxicities, and interventions to mitigate these risks, ensuring patients can benefit from these advances without compromising cardiovascular health.
Categories of immunotherapy in oncology
Table 1 summarizes types of immune therapies, their mechanisms, and approved indications. Cardiotoxicity from ICIs is rare (approximately 1%), but severe events such as refractory arrhythmia or cardiogenic shock can result in devastating clinical consequences with high mortality rates [2, 5]. The true incidence has not been fully characterized and is likely underreported, varying by rarity, immunotherapy type, cancer type, and patient factors. A contemporary comparative meta-analysis study showed treatment with ICIs was associated with a higher risk of myocarditis, pericardial disease, and MI compared with chemotherapy or placebo, though this was not reflected in observational studies [6]. Combination ICI therapy carries a higher risk and severity of cardiotoxicity than monotherapy [5, 7]. Cardiotoxicity in adoptive T-cell therapies is commonly related to cytokine release syndrome (CRS) when activation of the immune system results in a surge of cytokines and chemokines and subsequent T-cell therapy mediated tumor-cell lysis [8, 9]. Cohort studies on CAR T-cell therapy revealed 10% – 20% of patients experienced major adverse cardiovascular events, such as arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, and heart failure [8].
Summary of categories of immunotherapy, including subtypes, agents, mechanism of action, and approved indications for advanced solid tumors.
T-VEC, the oncolytic virus therapy for melanoma, has a low toxicity profile consisting of flu-like symptoms, such as fever, chills, and myalgia, or injection site reactions of redness or swelling. In one study assessing T-VEC in a real-life clinical setting, there was only one cardiac adverse event reported [10]. Studies on the cardiotoxic effects of anticancer vaccines are limited, but the side effects have been reported as flu-like symptoms similar to T-VEC, including fever, chills, headache, and myalgia [11].
Recent advancements in immune therapies include the development of cancer vaccines. One example is the personalized cancer vaccine developed by Moderna and Merck using V940 (mRNA-4157), a personalized neoantigen therapy using mRNA that can encode patient-specific neoantigens, to prevent melanoma recurrence. The open-label phase 2 trial revealed combining mRNA-4157 with Pembrolizumab reduced risk of recurrence or death compared to Pembrolizumab alone. The phase 3 trial of Adjuvant V940 (mRNA-4157) Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Adjuvant Placebo Plus Pembrolizumab in High-Risk Stage II–IV Melanoma Patients is expected to be complete in 2029 [12, 13]. Additionally, the SCIB1 and iSCIB1+ DNA vaccines, in phase 2 of clinical trials, have shown promise in treating melanoma. A preliminary study with SCIB1 has demonstrated a markedly enhanced T cell response, contributing to the eradication of tumors in melanoma patients [14].
Further examples of cancer vaccines include dendritic and whole cell, which employ immunotherapy cancer vaccines sipuleucel-T and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Usage of sipuleucel-T has resulted in significant overall survival outcomes for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. As an active cellular immunotherapy, the vaccine generates immune responses against PAP. The bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy is effective in preventing and treating superficial bladder cancer and mechanism behind the vaccine is the potentially activation of TH1 cytokine responses [14, 15].
Symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings
Cardiotoxicity associated with immunotherapy exhibits a spectrum of clinical presentations. Symptoms are contingent upon the specific type of cardiovascular toxicity and may range from asymptomatic presentations to non-specific symptoms like fatigue and palpitations, to more severe clinical manifestations like chest pain and dyspnea and even sudden cardiac death. The median onset of symptoms varies based on the employed immunotherapeutic agents, typically occurring between three months and one year post-treatment, influenced by cancer type and cardiotoxicity nature [2, 16]. Thus, rigorous cardiovascular monitoring is crucial for early detection and management. Table 2 outlines the types of cardiotoxicity, symptoms, diagnostic tests, and potential treatments.
Immunotherapy-associated cardiotoxicities vary by agent, timing, and clinical presentation. Myocarditis induced by ICIs often occurs within the first three months of beginning ICI treatments. Other cardiac complications, such as myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiomyopathy, have been discovered within 2–17 weeks following ICI treatment initiation [28]. By contrast, cardiotoxicities associated with adoptive T-cell therapies, such as CAR T-cell therapy, occur much sooner at a median of 5–21 days [29]. These differences are due to mechanistic reasons: ICI-related myocarditis may be driven by T-cell infiltration of the myocardium but CAR T-cell cardiotoxicities related to systemic inflammatory surges.
Management strategies for immunotherapy-related cardiotoxicities are generally tailored due to severity. Mild cases may respond well to temporarily ceasing immunotherapy and initiation of high-dose corticosteroids [30]. Moderate or severe cases may require more aggressive treatments or combination immunosuppression. Overall, graded approaches are essential as therapies may be elevated or depressed based on clinical response, biomarkers, and imaging findings.
Future clinical efforts are informed by advances in preclinical research. Currently, to reduce or control immunotoxicities, oncology and cardiology societies are developing new or improving upon current consensus guidelines to optimize screening, identify predictive biomarkers, and study novel therapies for mitigating risks [30]. These efforts may result in standardized clinical protocols and novel therapies that will improve patient outcomes without compromising oncologic benefits of immunotherapy.
Prevention approaches
As immunotherapy becomes more prevalent in cancer treatment, immunotherapy-related cardiotoxicity is a growing concern. Despite widespread use of these therapies, evidence-based cardiovascular screenings or preventative strategies are lacking. Understanding and mitigating this risk is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes while maximizing the therapeutic benefits of immunotherapies.
Preventing cardiotoxicity begins with risk stratification at cancer diagnosis, involving a thorough cardiovascular assessment, including obtaining cardiac history, physical examinations, and other baseline testing. Clinicians should consider factors such as pre-existing cardiovascular diseases, advanced age, and other risks before starting treatments, following guidelines outlined by the Heart Failure Association and International Cardio-Oncology Society [31]. For instance, a study by Drobni et al. shows ICI use was associated with a three-fold increase in the progression of atherosclerotic plaque [32]. Patients receiving corticosteroids during checkpoint therapy showed slower plaque progression (3.5% per year) compared to those not on corticosteroids (6.9% per year).
Many studies also call for baseline cardiac testing with ECG, cardiac stress test, echocardiogram, and troponin measurements to evaluate cardiac function, ischemic burden, and for any cardiac abnormalities prior to starting treatment [2, 6, 16, 31]. Patients at higher risk for cardiovascular toxicities are recommended to be referred to cardiologists or specialized cardio-oncologists for further evaluation and to optimize supportive strategies, such as controlling hypertension or dyslipidemia.
Ongoing monitoring of cardiac function during treatment is critical for early detection of cardiotoxicity. In high-risk patients, regular measurements of cardiac biomarkers (e.g., troponin, BNP), electrocardiograms (ECGs), and echocardiograms may help detect cardiovascular toxicities. A retrospective single center study on ICI-associated myocarditis found a strong association between an increase of cardiac biomarkers and disease severity, such as elevations in creatinine kinase, myoglobin, and troponin, occurring before symptom onset, such as diagnosis of arrhythmia or myocarditis. These cardiac biomarkers decreased after the glucocorticoid treatment with methylprednisolone, supporting the benefit of routine monitoring for early detection of immunotherapy-related cardiovascular toxicities [33].
Early referral to a cardiologist for co-management in high-risk populations, such as those with underlying heart conditions or EKGs, is crucial for preventing and managing cardiotoxicities. A multidisciplinary team of interventional cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, cardiologists, and other specialists evaluate patients’ comorbidities, clinical stability, etc. to develop a patient-specific treatment plan. The “Heart Team” (HT) approach assesses cardiovascular conditions including peripheral vascular disease, pulmonary embolism, valvular heart disease, and cardiogenic shock to gather clinical data, classifies risk factors, and potentially perform noninvasive testing before the HT meets to create a formal management recommendation [34].
Conclusion
Immunotherapy-associated cardiovascular toxicities, though rare, carry high mortality risks. Their true incidence is understudied, underreported, and expected to increase with increased immunotherapy use. Therefore, developing strategies for risk stratification, prevention, and monitoring is essential. As understanding of these cardiotoxicities evolve, new prevention and management approaches are likely.
Early recognition of symptoms, comprehensive cardiac assessments with baseline diagnostics, and a multidisciplinary approach can help minimize the risk of adverse cardiovascular events.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Data availability statement
This article has no associated data generated
Author contribution statement
Conceptualization, Y.X., H.T.W.; Methodology, Y.X.; Validation, Y.X., H.T.W.; Visualization, Y.X., H.T.W.; Formal Analysis, Y.X., H.T.W., S.W.; Investigation, Y.X.; Resources, Y.X.; Data curation, Y.X., H.T.W., V.H., S.W.; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Y.X., H.T.W., S.W.; Writing – Review & Editing, All authors; Supervision, Y.X.; Project Administration, Y.X.
Ethics approval
Ethics approval was not required.
References
- Yan T, Yu L, Zhang J, Chen Y, Fu Y, Tang J, et al. Achilles’ Heel of currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors: immune related adverse events. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1292122. [Google Scholar]
- Shalata W, Abu-Salman A, Steckbeck R, Mathew Jacob B, Massalha I, Yakobson A. Cardiac toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review. Cancers. 2021;13(20):5218. [Google Scholar]
- Mahalingam P, Newsom-Davis T. Cancer immunotherapy and the management of side effects. Clin Med Lond Engl. 2023; 23(1):56–60. [Google Scholar]
- Schneider BJ, Naidoo J, Santomasso BD, Lacchetti C, Adkins S, Anadkat M, et al. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(36):4073–4126. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rubio-Infante N, Ramírez-Flores YA, Castillo EC, Lozano O, García-Rivas G, Torre-Amione G. Cardiotoxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021;23(10):1739–1747. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma A, Alexander G, Chu JH, Markopoulos A, Maloul G, Ayub MT, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and cardiotoxicity: a comparative meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13(10):e032620. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson MT, Balko JM, Compton ML, Chalkias S, Gorham J, Xu Y, et al. Fulminant myocarditis with combination immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1749–1755. [Google Scholar]
- Ganatra S, Dani SS, Yang EH, Zaha VG, Nohria A. Cardiotoxicity of T-cell antineoplastic therapies. JACC CardioOncol. 2022;4(5):616–623. [Google Scholar]
- Neelapu SS, Tummala S, Kebriaei P, Wierda W, Gutierrez C, Locke FL, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy - assessment and management of toxicities. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(1):47–62. [Google Scholar]
- Ressler JM, Karasek M, Koch L, Silmbrod R, Mangana J, Latifyan S, et al. Real-life use of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in melanoma patients in centers in Austria, Switzerland and Germany. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(2):e001701. [Google Scholar]
- Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND, Berger ER, Small EJ, Penson DF, et al. Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(5):411–422. [Google Scholar]
- Weber JS, Carlino MS, Khattak A, Meniawy T, Ansstas G, Taylor MH, et al. Individualised neoantigen therapy mRNA-4157 (V940) plus pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab monotherapy in resected melanoma (KEYNOTE-942): a randomised, phase 2b study. Lancet. 2024;403(10427):632–644. [Google Scholar]
- Khattak A, Weber JS, Meniawy T, Taylor MH, Ansstas G, Kim KB, et al. Distant metastasis-free survival results from the randomized, phase 2 mRNA-4157–P201/KEYNOTE-942 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(17_suppl):LBA9503. [Google Scholar]
- Patel PM, Ottensmeier CH, Mulatero C, Lorigan P, Plummer R, Pandha H, et al. Targeting gp100 and TRP-2 with a DNA vaccine: Incorporating T cell epitopes with a human IgG1 antibody induces potent T cell responses that are associated with favourable clinical outcome in a phase I/II trial. OncoImmunology. 2018;7(6):e1433516. [Google Scholar]
- Lamm DL. Bacillus calmette-guerin immunotherapy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 1985;134(1):40–46. [Google Scholar]
- Burns EA, Gentille C, Trachtenberg B, Pingali SR, Anand K. Cardiotoxicity associated with anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) therapy: recognition, risk factors, and management. Dis Basel Switz. 2021;9(1):20. [Google Scholar]
- Ball S, Ghosh RK, Wongsaengsak S, Bandyopadhyay D, Ghosh GC, Aronow WS. Cardiovascular toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(13):1714–1727. [Google Scholar]
- Chen DY, Huang WK, Chien-Chia Wu V, Chang WC, Chen JS, Chuang CK, et al. Cardiovascular toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: A review when cardiology meets immuno-oncology. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119(10):1461–1475. [Google Scholar]
- Michel L, Rassaf T, Totzeck M. Cardiotoxicity from immune checkpoint inhibitors. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2019;25:100420. [Google Scholar]
- Antiarrhythmic Drugs. Types, use & side effects – Heart Foundation NZ [Internet] [cited 2024 Sep 17]. Available from: https://www.heartfoundation.org.nz/your-heart/heart-treatments/medications/anti-arrhythmics. [Google Scholar]
- Slivnick JA, Betz J, Kalbfleisch S, Crouser ED, Kahwash R. High-dose intravenous glucocorticoids are effective in the acute management of ventricular arrhythmias in cardiac sarcoidosis: A case series. Hear Case Rep. 2020;6(10):706–710. [Google Scholar]
- Mayo Clinic [Internet]. [cited 2024 Sep 17]. Dilated cardiomyopathy: Enlarged heart struggles to pump blood-Dilated cardiomyopathy – Diagnosis & treatment. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/dilated-cardiomyopathy/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20353155. [Google Scholar]
- van der Hooft CS, Heeringa J, Brusselle GG, Hofman A, Witteman JCM, Kingma JH, et al. Corticosteroids and the risk of atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(9):1016–1020. [Google Scholar]
- Raschi E, Rossi S, De Giglio A, Fusaroli M, Burgazzi F, Rinaldi R, et al. Cardiovascular toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a guide for clinicians. Drug Saf. 2023;46(9):819–833. [Google Scholar]
- Myocarditis in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors – clinical key [Internet]. [cited 2024 Sep 17]. Available from: https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S0735109718333680?returnurl=https:%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0735109718333680%3Fshowall%3Dtrue&referrer=https:%2F%2Fpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2F. [Google Scholar]
- Matzen E, Bartels LE, Løgstrup B, Horskær S, Stilling C, Donskov F. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myocarditis in cancer patients: a case report and review of reported cases. Cardio-Oncol. 2021;7:27. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper LT. Myocarditis. N Engl J Med. 360(15):1526–1538. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou YW, Zhu YJ, Wang MN, Xie Y, Chen CY, Zhang T, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor- associated cardiotoxicity: current understanding on its mechanism, diagnosis and management. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1350. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2019.01350/full. [Google Scholar]
- Camilli M, Maggio L, Tinti L, Lamendola P, Lanza GA, Crea F, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy-related cardiotoxicity in adults and children cancer patients: A clinical appraisal. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1090103. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1090103/full. [Google Scholar]
- Lyon AR, López-Fernández T, Couch LS, Asteggiano R, Aznar MC, Bergler-Klein J, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS): Developed by the task force on cardio-oncology of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2022;43(41):4229–4361. [Google Scholar]
- Lyon AR, López-Fernández T, Couch LS, Asteggiano R, Aznar MC, Bergler-Klein J, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS). Eur Heart J. 2022;43(41):4229–4361. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drobni ZD, Alvi RM, Taron J, Zafar A, Murphy SP, Rambarat PK, et al. Association between immune checkpoint inhibitors with cardiovascular events and atherosclerotic plaque. Circulation. 2020;142(24):2299–2311. [Google Scholar]
- Wang F, Sun X, Qin S, Hua H, Liu X, Yang L, et al. A retrospective study of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis in a single center in China. Chin Clin Oncol. 2020; 9(2):16. [Google Scholar]
- Young MN, Kolte D, Cadigan ME, Laikhter E, Sinclair K, Pomerantsev E, et al. Multidisciplinary heart team approach for complex coronary artery disease: single center clinical presentation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(8):e014738. [Google Scholar]
Cite this article as: Wu HT, Hsu V, Win S & Xing Y. Anti-cancer immunotherapy-related cardiotoxicity: preventable and treatable. Visualized Cancer Medicine. 2025. 6, 1. https://doi.org/10.1051/vcm/2025003.
All Tables
Summary of categories of immunotherapy, including subtypes, agents, mechanism of action, and approved indications for advanced solid tumors.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.